Compare hide.me on privacy, head-to-head

Five detailed, fact-based comparisons against the VPNs privacy-conscious users most often weigh against hide.me.

Every VPN below makes a no-logs claim. What actually differs is jurisdiction, whether that claim has been through a named, repeatable third-party audit, and what a dropped connection actually does to your traffic. Each comparison below pulls those specifics apart instead of declaring one universal "winner."

Jurisdiction & audit summary

ProviderJurisdictionNo-logs auditKill switch
hide.meMalaysia – outside the 5-Eyes, 9-Eyes and 14-Eyes intelligence-sharing alliancesIndependently audited no-logs policy (Securitum, first audited 2015, re-audited yearly), a public transparency report published every year since 2013, and VPN Trust Initiative accreditationStealth Guard – a per-app kill switch that automatically cuts internet if the VPN drops, plus Multihop double-VPN routing and Dynamic Port Forwarding
Proton VPNSwitzerlandOpen-source apps with an openly published, publicly downloadable no-logs auditSystem-wide and per-app kill switch (Advanced Kill Switch)
MullvadSweden – notably a member of the 14-Eyes alliance, unlike hide.me's MalaysiaIndependently audited (Cure53, Assured AB) – and no account requires an email at all, just a randomly generated numberAlways-on kill switch by default (not an optional toggle)
PrivadoVPNSwitzerlandAES-256 encryption and a published no-log policy, bundled with an ad blocker and antivirusKill switch included on desktop and mobile apps
CyberGhostRomania (legally); owned by Kape Technologies, headquartered in the UKNo-logs policy the company says was audited by Deloitte, though the report isn't public – customers must request it directlyKill switch included across apps
WindscribeCanada – a Five Eyes member, unlike hide.me's MalaysiaOpen-source apps and published transparency reports, but no named third-party no-logs audit as of our researchFirewall-based kill switch (“Secure Hotspot”)

Measured on the same line

Where we have hands-on speed results, they are ranked here; hide.me is highlighted.

#VPNEurope, MbpsPingUS, MbpsPingEU kept
1Proton VPN 26242 ms 126174 ms89%
2hide.me this site 22247 ms 200163 ms74%
3Windscribe 22244 ms 203108 ms75%
4NordVPN 21031 ms 200111 ms72%
5Surfshark 21079 ms 203112 ms71%
6LetsVPN 20742 ms 202181 ms70%
7PrivadoVPN 20042 ms 160132 ms68%
8PureVPN 20039 ms 209177 ms68%
9CyberGhost 19442 ms 210126 ms66%
10ExpressVPN 18135 ms 160112 ms62%
11AdGuard VPN 13646 ms 200171 ms46%

Proton VPN was tested on its Stealth protocol and Windscribe on WireGuard 443; the other VPNs were left on their app defaults.

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which VPN was fastest in your tests?

Proton VPN had the highest nearest-European download, but it was tested on its Stealth protocol and its upload was far lower. See the league table; a single run cannot crown a winner.

Were the VPNs tested under the same conditions?

Same line, same machine and a fresh baseline for each, but not the same server country or protocol. The table notes the differences.

Why compare hide.me with these five?

They are the VPNs people most often consider alongside it. Where we have hands-on results for a rival, the comparison page shows them next to ours.

Do you have results for every VPN here?

No. The session covered 11 VPNs; for any rival outside that set the comparison page says so and relies on public information only.

Compare VPNs side by side

See current plans, prices and refund terms for the VPNs we recommend.