hide.me vs CyberGhost: which privacy-focused VPN should you actually pick?

A side-by-side on jurisdiction, audit history, kill switch and what each service is genuinely good at.

Measured head-to-head: hide.me vs CyberGhost

Our own captures for hide.me and CyberGhost, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

Measuredhide.meCyberGhost
Baseline download (VPN off)298 Mbps295 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverBerlinStrasbourg
Nearest Europe: download222 Mbps (74%)194 Mbps (66%)
Nearest Europe: upload178 Mbps157 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping47 ms42 ms
Long-distance US: download200 Mbps (67%)210 Mbps (71%)
Long-distance US: ping163 ms126 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayernot captured captured
Netflix capturednot captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route hide.me kept 74% of its baseline against 66% for CyberGhost (a gap of 8 points); on the US route 67% against 71%. The gap is large enough to be worth noting, though it is still one run per route.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All hide.me captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, hide.me or CyberGhost?

On the nearest-European route hide.me delivered 222 Mbps against CyberGhost's 194 Mbps (74% vs 66% of each baseline); on the US route 200 vs 210 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is hide.me or CyberGhost better for streaming?

We captured hide.me playing Netflix. For CyberGhost we captured BBC iPlayer. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for hide.me are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.

hide.meCyberGhost
Price€11.99/mo billed monthly, or as low as €2.69/mo on the 24+2-month plan (€69.99 billed every 26 months) – every plan carries a “renews at the same price” guaranteeAggressive long-term-plan discounts, noticeably higher at the month-to-month rate
JurisdictionMalaysia – outside the 5-Eyes, 9-Eyes and 14-Eyes intelligence-sharing alliancesRomania (legally); owned by Kape Technologies, headquartered in the UK
Free planA genuine lifetime free plan – no ads, no data-selling, no throttling, capped monthly dataNo ongoing free plan
Simultaneous devicesUp to 10 simultaneous connections7 simultaneous connections
Server footprint2,600+ servers in 92+ countries, rated up to 10 Gbps each9,000+ servers in 100 countries
No-logs auditIndependently audited no-logs policy (Securitum, first audited 2015, re-audited yearly), a public transparency report published every year since 2013, and VPN Trust Initiative accreditationNo-logs policy the company says was audited by Deloitte, though the report isn't public – customers must request it directly
Kill switchStealth Guard – a per-app kill switch that automatically cuts internet if the VPN drops, plus Multihop double-VPN routing and Dynamic Port ForwardingKill switch included across apps

Where CyberGhost pulls ahead

One of the largest server fleets in the industry and a 45-day money-back window on longer plans. On jurisdiction, CyberGhost is based in Romania (legally); owned by Kape Technologies, headquartered in the UK. On audit history: no-logs policy the company says was audited by deloitte, though the report isn't public – customers must request it directly

Where hide.me pulls ahead

hide.me's no-logs policy has been independently audited every year since 2015 by Securitum, it publishes a transparency report every year going back to 2013, and it holds VPN Trust Initiative accreditation – a longer, more repeated verification history than most VPN reviews can point to. Its Malaysia jurisdiction sits outside the 5-Eyes, 9-Eyes and 14-Eyes alliances, and Stealth Guard's per-app kill switch automatically cuts your connection the instant the VPN tunnel drops.

Who each one is really for

If CyberGhost's specific strengths – one of the largest server fleets in the industry and a 45-day money-back window on longer plans – matter most to you, it's a reasonable pick. If a repeated, named third-party no-logs audit and a jurisdiction outside every major surveillance alliance are non-negotiable for your threat model, hide.me's track record is hard to match.

Our verdict

CyberGhost's server count and money-back window are generous, but its ownership by Kape Technologies – which also owns ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access – is worth knowing if you specifically want an independent provider; hide.me states plainly on its own about page that it's “100% independent” and not part of a larger holding group. And CyberGhost's Deloitte audit report isn't public the way hide.me's Securitum report is.

See Today's Best VPN Deals